The augment designer: A conceptual pedagogical framework for integrating generative AI into design education
DOI
Published 2026-09-03
Keywords
- augment designer,
- critical thinking,
- design pedagogy,
- ethical practice,
- generative AI
Copyright (c) 2027 © 2027 Authors. Published by the University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Department of Graphic Engineering and Design. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license 4.0 Serbia.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
The rapid rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping design practice and raising important questions for design education. Rather than framing AI as either a threat to creativity or a technological solution, this paper proposes the Augment Designer, a conceptual pedagogical framework for integrating AI into design learning. Informed by the implementation of the Digital Design Skills (DDS) module and drawing on the structure of the DDS Handbook (2025), the framework outlines a staged approach that combines AI-assisted exploration, technical refinement through professional design tools, and critical reflection. The framework encourages students to engage with questions of authorship, originality, aesthetic bias, intellectual property, creative labour, and sustainability while developing digital design competencies. By positioning AI as an augmentative partner within a structured learning process, the Augment Designer seeks to support the development of critically engaged, reflective, and ethically aware design practitioners. As a preliminary conceptual contribution, the framework provides a foundation for future pedagogical implementation and empirical evaluation in AI-integrated design education.
References
- Ambrose, G., Harris, P. & Ball, N. (2019) The fundamentals of graphic design. 2nd ed. London, Bloomsbury Visual Arts.
- Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3 (2), 77–101. Available from: doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Buchanan, R. (2001) Design research and the new learning. Design Issues. 17 (4), 3–23. Available from: doi: 10.1162/07479360152681056
- Creswell, J. W. & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017) Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, SAGE Publications.
- Crow, D. (2022) Visible signs: an introduction to semiotics in the visual arts. 4th ed. New York, Bloomsbury Visual Arts.
- Foka, A., Griffin, G., Ortiz Pablo, D., Rajkowska, P. & Badri, S. (2025) Tracing the bias loop: AI, cultural heritage and bias-mitigating in practice. AI & Society. 40 (8), 5835–5847. Available from: doi: 10.1007/s00146-025-02349-z
- Forlano, L. (2017) Data rituals in intimate infrastructures: crip time and the disabled cyborg body as an epistemic site of feminist science. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience. 3 (2), 1–28. Available from: doi: 10.28968/cftt.v3i2.28843
- Ge, P. & Fan, F. (2024) A systematic review of the role of artificial intelligence in design education. In: Grierson, H., Bohemia, E. and Buck, L. (eds.) DS 131: Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, E&PDE 2024, 5 - 6 September 2024, Birmingham, United Kingdom. Glasgow, The Design Society. pp. 103–108. Available from: doi: 10.35199/EPDE.2024.18
- Huang, Y.-C. J., Wensveen, S. A. G. & Funk, M. (2023) Experiential speculation in vision-based AI design education: designing conventional and progressive AI futures. International Journal of Design. 17 (2), 1–17. Available from: doi: 10.57698/v17i2.01
- Lawson, B. (2006) How designers think: the design process demystified. 4th ed. London, Routledge. Available from: doi: 10.4324/9780080454979
- Low, B., Ehret, C. & Hagh, A. (2025) Algorithmic imaginings and critical digital literacy on #BookTok. New Media & Society. 27 (4), 2336–2353. Available from: doi: 10.1177/14614448231206466
- Meron, Y. & Tekmen Araci, Y. (2023) Artificial intelligence in design education: evaluating ChatGPT as a virtual colleague for post-graduate course development. Design Science. 9, e30. Available from: doi: 10.1017/dsj.2023.28
- Noble, I. & Bestley, R. (2017) Visual research: an introduction to research methods in graphic design. 3rd ed. London, Bloomsbury Visual Arts.
- Ramesh, A., Dhariwal, P., Nichol, A., Chu, C. & Chen, M. (2022) Hierarchical text-conditional image generation with CLIP latents. arXiv:2204.06125. Available from: doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2204.06125
- Risteska, A. (2023) Aware and critical navigation in the media landscape: (un)biased algorithms and the need for new media literacy in the era of artificial intelligence and digital media. KAIROS: Media and Communications Review. 2 (2), 16–38.
- Saharia, C., Chan, W., Saxena, S., Li, L., Whang, J., Denton, E. L., Ghasemipour, K., Gontijo Lopes, R., Karagol Ayan, B., Salimans, T., Ho, J., Fleet, D. J. & Norouzi, M. (2022) Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language understanding. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35: 36th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NeurIPS 2022, 28 November - 9 December 2022, New Orleans, Louisiana. Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation. pp. 36479–36494. Available from: doi: 10.52202/068431-2643
- Schön, D. A. (1987) Educating the reflective practitioner: toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
- Yan, L., Sha, L., Zhao, L., Li, Y., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Chen, G., Li, X., Jin, Y. & Gašević, D. (2024) Practical and ethical challenges of large language models in education: a systematic scoping review. British Journal of Educational Technology. 55 (1), 90–112. Available from: doi: 10.1111/bjet.13370