Journal of Graphic Engineering and Design

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut ero labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco.

GUIDE FOR AUTHORS SUBMIT MANUSCRIPT
Forthcoming
Professional paper

Curating pedagogical change: A model for leadership and co-creation in student-led exhibition practice

Nace Pušnik
Xiamen University, Institute of Creativity and Innovation, University for the Creative Arts, Fujian, China

Published 2026-07-06

abstract views: 3 // Full text article (PDF): 3


Keywords

  • co-creation,
  • experiential learning,
  • project-based learning (PBL),
  • pedagogical transformation,
  • transformational leadership

How to Cite

Pušnik, N. (2026). Curating pedagogical change: A model for leadership and co-creation in student-led exhibition practice. Journal of Graphic Engineering and Design. Retrieved from https://sp.ftn.uns.ac.rs/index.php/jged/article/view/2724

Abstract

This paper examines how pedagogical and operational strategies were put into practice while integrating a large-scale student exhibition, held as part of the European Design Awards festival, into the academic curriculum. The initiative was guided by experiential and project-based learning (PBL). It sought, above all, to connect classroom teaching with professional practice. In practice, the methodology tended to emphasize collaborative planning, structured team roles, and sustained staff engagement, grounded in principles of motivation and autonomy. These principles were evident in how students managed their own sub-projects. The main strategies involved creating dedicated teams for mentoring, curation, and logistics; introducing structured communication processes; and fostering an environment that promoted a sense of ownership among both students and staff. The results suggested a meaningful and lasting impact on both students and faculty. The project equipped students with industry-relevant skills and opened new professional opportunities. For faculty, this meant rethinking their role from knowledge deliverers to facilitators of hands-on, real-world learning, which encouraged more collaborative and student-led teaching methods. The institution also gained recognition within the European design community. In retrospect, the process itself proved to be a powerful driver of innovation, growth, and cultural change, despite challenges such as workload and resources. The study concludes that immersive, student-led projects are most effective when embedded into the curriculum, though their long-term sustainability depends on continued institutional support.

Article history: Received (September 26, 2025); Revised (February 23, 2026); Accepted (April 6, 2026)

PlumX Metrics

Dimensions Citation Metrics

References

  1. Amabile, T. M. & Kramer, S. J. (2011) The progress principle: Using small wins to ignite joy, engagement, and creativity at work. Boston, Harvard Business Review Press.
  2. Barrows, H. S. (1996) Problem‐based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. 1996 (68), 3–12. Available from: doi: 10.1002/tl.37219966804
  3. Bass, B. M. & Riggio, R. E. (2006) Transformational Leadership. Hove, Psychology Press. Available from: doi: 10.4324/9781410617095
  4. Belbin, R. M. (2012) Team Roles at Work. Abingdon, Routledge. Available from: doi: 10.4324/9780080963242
  5. Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (2011) Teaching for quality learning at university. 4th ed. Maidenhead, McGraw-Hill Education.
  6. Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998) Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. 5 (1), 7–74. Available from: doi: 10.1080/0969595980050102
  7. Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M. & Palincsar, A. (1991) Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning. Educational Psychologist. 26 (3-4), 369–398. Available from: doi: 10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139
  8. Edmondson, A. (1999) Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly. 44 (2), 350–383. Available from: doi: 10.2307/2666999
  9. Garrison, D. & Kanuka, H. (2004) Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education. 7 (2), 95–105. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
  10. Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007) The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research. 77 (1), 81–112. Available from: doi: 10.3102/003465430298487
  11. Kaplanoglu, L. & Dinç, I. D. (2019) Global interactive media design industry’s sectoral analysis on interactive media awards. Journal of Graphic Engineering and Design. 10 (2), 39–53. Available from: doi: 10.24867/JGED-2019-2-039
  12. Kolb, D. A. (1984) Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall. Kong, Y. (2021) The Role of Experiential Learning on Students’ Motivation and Classroom Engagement. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. Available from: doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.771272
  13. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  14. Northouse, P. G. (2021) Leadership: Theory and practice. 9th ed. Thousand Oaks, SAGE Publications.
  15. Opoku, N., Appiah, E. & deGraft-Yankson, P. (2020) Competencies of the present-day Graphic Designer: A document analysis of online job ads in Ghana. Journal of Graphic Engineering and Design. 11 (2), 37–45. Available from: doi: 10.24867/JGED-2020-2-037
  16. Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist. 55 (1), 68–78. Available from: doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  17. Taneja, K. (2025) A framework of project-based learning (PBL) pedagogy for graphic design education. Journal of Graphic Engineering and Design. 16 (4), 25–36. Available from: doi: 10.24867/JGED-2025-4-025
  18. Uhl-Bien, M. & Arena, M. (2018) Leadership for organizational adaptability: A theoretical synthesis and integrative framework. The Leadership Quarterly. 29 (1), 89–104. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.009
  19. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
  20. Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  21. Zhang, X. & Bartol, K. M. (2010) Linking Empowering Leadership and Employee Creativity: The Influence of Psychological Empowerment, Intrinsic Motivation, and Creative Process Engagement. Academy of Management Journal. 53 (1), 107–128. Available from: doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.48037118
  22. Zijlstra, F. R. H., Cropley, M. & Rydstedt, L. W. (2014) From Recovery to Regulation: An Attempt to Reconceptualize ‘Recovery from Work’. Stress and Health. 30 (3), 244–252. Available from: doi: 10.1002/smi.2604