Journal of Production Engineering

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut ero labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco.

GUIDE FOR AUTHORS SUBMIT MANUSCRIPT
Vol. 29 No. 1 (2026)
Original Research Article

CFD and FEA-based assessment of an oscillating underwater energy harvester for river flow energy harvesting

Carloandhre Pareja
Reykjavík University, Department of Engineering, Menntavegur 2, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland
David C. Finger
Reykjavík University, Department of Engineering, Menntavegur 2, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland
Juan Manuel Rosselló
Reykjavík University, Department of Engineering, Menntavegur 2, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland

Published 2026-06-15

abstract views: 23


Keywords

  • Hydrokinetic energy,
  • Underwater energy harvester,
  • CFD,
  • FEA,
  • Structural analysis

How to Cite

Pareja, C., C. Finger, D., & Manuel Rosselló , J. (2026). CFD and FEA-based assessment of an oscillating underwater energy harvester for river flow energy harvesting. Journal of Production Engineering, 29(1), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.24867/JPE-2026-01-032

Abstract

This study investigates the numerical performance of an oscillating underwater energy harvester intended for hydrokinetic energy recovery in river flow environments. The analysed concept is based on an oscillating cylinder developed within the H-HOPE project and designed to convert flow-induced motion into usable mechanical energy. A combined Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and Finite Element Analysis (FEA) approach was applied to evaluate both the hydrodynamic response of the device and its structural behaviour under simulated operating conditions. The CFD results showed that cylinder diameter has a clear influence on the generated power. The 61 mm cylinder produced an average power output of 3.02 W, whereas the 49 mm cylinder generated 2.05 W, indicating a reduction of approximately 32% for the smaller configuration. The structural analysis showed that the maximum Von Mises stress remained below the yield strength of aluminium 6061, while the obtained safety factor of 2.10 confirmed the mechanical adequacy of the design under the analysed loading conditions. The results indicate that the proposed harvester has potential for small-scale river energy applications, particularly where compact and decentralized renewable energy solutions are required. However, further work should include fatigue assessment, fluid–structure interaction analysis and experimental validation under real river flow conditions.

PlumX Metrics

Dimensions Citation Metrics

References

  1. Alteyeb, A., & Jolgaf, A. (2017). Structural Stress Analysis in Hydrokinetic Energy Systems. Journal of Ocean Engineering, 138: 45–56.
  2. Alvear, D., Hatem, M., & Qasim, H. (2021). Simulation of hydrodynamic performance of small-scale hydrokinetic devices. Renewable Energy, 179: 1212–1226.
  3. Brook, B., Hansen, J., & Smith, P. (2014). Variability and Intermittency in Renewable Energy Systems. Energy Policy, 65: 25–32.
  4. Cengel, Y. A., & Cimbala, J. M. (2004). Fluid Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications. McGraw-Hill Education.
  5. H-Hope Project. (2024). Hidden and Untapped Hydropower Opportunities. Retrieved March 20, 2025, from https://www.h-hope.eu
  6. Katsidoniotaki, E., Tanwar, N., et al. (2023). CFD modeling of wave-structure interaction for energy extraction. Ocean Engineering, 266: 113123.
  7. Lam, W., & Shamsuddin, A. H. (2013). Foundation Technologies for River Energy Converters. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25: 398–408.
  8. Wilcox, D. C. (2008). Formulation of the k-ω Turbulence Model Revisited. AIAA Journal, 46(11): 2823–2838.