Journal of Production Engineering

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut ero labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco.

Search
GUIDE FOR AUTHORS SUBMIT MANUSCRIPT
Vol. 28 No. 2 (2025)
Original Research Article

Impact behavior of kevlar-epoxy composites: the effect of aluminium oxynitride reinforcement

FULL TEXT ARTICLE (PDF)
  • Hyginus C. O. Unegbu,
  • Danjuma Saleh Yawas
Hyginus C. O. Unegbu
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
Danjuma Saleh Yawas
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24867/JPE-2025-01-032

Published 2025-12-15

abstract views: 1 // FULL TEXT ARTICLE (PDF): 0


Keywords

  • Kevlar-epoxy composite,
  • Aluminium Oxynitride,
  • Impact Resistance,
  • Crack deflection,
  • Nanoparticle reinforcement,
  • Aerospace applications,
  • Damage resistance
    • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

C. O. Unegbu, H., & Yawas , D. S. (2025). Impact behavior of kevlar-epoxy composites: the effect of aluminium oxynitride reinforcement. Journal of Production Engineering, 28(2), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.24867/JPE-2025-01-032

Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Production Engineering

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This study investigates the impact performance of Kevlar–epoxy composites reinforced with aluminium oxynitride (AlON) nanoparticles, aiming to optimize energy absorption and damage resistance. To address gaps in current research, composites with AlON concentrations of 0%, 2%, 5%, and 10% were fabricated using vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM). Impact tests conducted in accordance with ASTM D7136 standards evaluated the composites’ response to high-energy impacts. The results demonstrated that the inclusion of AlON significantly enhanced the impact resistance of the composites, with the 5% AlON variant showing a 39% improvement in absorbed energy compared to the unreinforced baseline. This increase in toughness was primarily attributed to crack deflection and bridging mechanisms provided by the well-dispersed AlON particles. However, at 10% AlON, particle agglomeration introduced stress concentrations, leading to reduced performance gains. Comprehensive analysis using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and ultrasonic C-scan imaging revealed reduced delamination areas, minimized matrix cracking, and improved homogeneity of AlON dispersion in the 5% composite. These findings included a 35% reduction in delamination area compared to the control, underscoring the effectiveness of the 5% AlON reinforcement. Response surface methodology (RSM) further validated that 5% AlON was the optimal reinforcement level, offering the best balance between impact resistance and material stability. Overall, AlON-reinforced Kevlar–epoxy composites—particularly those containing 5% AlON—exhibit strong potential for lightweight, high-impact applications. Future research should investigate their environmental durability under extreme conditions, including thermal cycling and moisture exposure, to ensure long-term performance.

PlumX Metrics

Dimensions Citation Metrics

FULL TEXT ARTICLE (PDF)

References

  1. Reis, P. N. B., Ferreira, J. A. M., Santos, P., Richardson, M. O. W., & Santos, J. B. (2012). Impact response of Kevlar composites with filled epoxy matrix. Composite Structures, 94(12), 3520–3528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.05.025
  2. Sreejith, M., & Rajeev, R. S. (2021). Fiber reinforced composites for aerospace and sports applications. In Fiber reinforced composites: Constituents, compatibility, perspectives, and applications (pp. 821–859). Woodhead Publishing Series in Composites Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821090-0
  3. Sprenger, S. (2020). Nanosilica-toughened epoxy resins. Polymers, 12(8), 1777. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12081777
  4. Guo, G., Alam, S., & Peel, L. D. (2022). An investigation of deformation and failure mechanisms of fiber-reinforced composites in layered composite armor. Composite Structures, 281, 115125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115125
  5. Yadav, R., Singh, M., Shekhawat, D., Lee, S.-Y., & Park, S.-J. (2023). The role of fillers to enhance the mechanical, thermal, and wear characteristics of polymer composite materials: A review. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 175, 107775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107775
  6. Gök, D. A., Bayraktar, C., & Hoşkun, M. (2024). A review on processing, mechanical and wear properties of Al matrix composites reinforced with Al₂O₃, SiC, B₄C, and MgO by powder metallurgy method. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 31, 1132–1150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.06.110
  7. Reis, P. N. B., Ferreira, J. A. M., & Richardson, M. O. W. (2011). Effect of strain rate on the impact response of Kevlar composites. Composite Structures, 93(2), 659–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.08.010
  8. Rashid, A. B., Haque, M., Islam, S. M. M., & Labib, K. M. R. U. (2024). Nanotechnology-enhanced fiber-reinforced polymer composites: Recent advancements on processing techniques and applications. Heliyon, 10(2), e24692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24692
  9. Singh, D., Dharshan, G. N. V., Akshay, A., Kumar, R. R., Gaur, P., Ganesan, C., Joshua, J. J., & Nisha, M. S. (2022). Investigation of fatigue behavior of Kevlar composites with nano-graphene filled epoxy resin. Materials Today: Proceedings, 62(Part 2), 773–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.03.674
  10. Khan, F., Hossain, N., Mim, J. J., Rahman, S. M. M., Iqbal, M. J., Billah, M., & Chowdhury, M. A. (2024). Advances of composite materials in automobile applications – A review. Journal of Engineering Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2024.02.017
  11. Sookay, N. K., von Klemperer, C. J., & Verijenko, V. E. (2003). Environmental testing of advanced epoxy composites. Composite Structures, 62(3–4), 429–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2003.09.016
  12. Protyai, M. I. H., Adib, F. M., Taher, T. I., Karim, M. R., & Rashid, A. B. (2024). Performance evaluation of Kevlar fiber reinforced epoxy composite by depositing graphene/SiC/Al₂O₃ nanoparticles. Hybrid Advances, 6, 100245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hybadv.2024.100245
  13. Zando, R. B., Mesgarnejad, A., Pan, C., Shefelbine, S. J., Karma, A., & Erb, R. M. (2021). Enhanced toughness in ceramic-reinforced polymer composites with herringbone architectures. Composites Science and Technology, 204, 108513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108513
  14. Ning, N., Wang, M., Zhou, G., Qiu, Y., & Wei, Y. (2022). Effect of polymer nanoparticle morphology on fracture toughness enhancement of carbon fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Composites Part B: Engineering, 234, 109749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109749
  15. Sikarwar, R. S., Velmurugan, R., & Gupta, N. K. (2014). Influence of fiber orientation and thickness on the response of glass/epoxy composites subjected to impact loading. Composites Part B: Engineering, 60, 627–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.12.023
  16. Nanoth, R., Jayanarayanan, K., Sarath Kumar, P., Balachandran, M., & Pegoretti, A. (2023). Static and dynamic mechanical properties of hybrid polymer composites: A comprehensive review of experimental, micromechanical, and simulation approaches. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 174, 107741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107741
  17. Bandaru, A. K., Ahmad, S., & Bhatnagar, N. (2017). Ballistic performance of hybrid thermoplastic composite armors reinforced with Kevlar and basalt fabrics. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 97, 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.12.007
  18. Zare, Y. (2016). Study of nanoparticles aggregation/agglomeration in polymer particulate nanocomposites by mechanical properties. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 84, 158–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.01.020
  19. Sukanya, N. M., & Sundaram, S. K. (2022). Ballistic behaviour of nanosilica and rubber reinforced Kevlar/epoxy composite targets. Engineering Failure Analysis, 142, 106845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106845
  20. Zhang, H., Sun, J., Rui, X., & Liu, S. (2023). Delamination damage imaging method of CFRP composite laminate plates based on the sensitive guided wave mode. Composite Structures, 306, 116571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116571
  21. Nadondu, B., Surin, P., & Deeying, J. (2022). Multi-objective optimization on mechanical properties of glass-carbon and durian skin fiber reinforced poly(lactic acid) hybrid composites using the extreme mixture design response surface methodology. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 17, e01675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01675
  22. Reis, P. N. B., Ferreira, J. A. M., Zhang, Z. Y., Benameur, T., & Richardson, M. O. W. (2013). Impact response of Kevlar composites with nanoclay enhanced epoxy matrix. Composites Part B: Engineering, 46, 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.028
  23. Alsaadi, M., Bulut, M., Erkliğ, A., & Jabbar, A. (2018). Nano-silica inclusion effects on mechanical and dynamic behavior of fiber reinforced carbon/Kevlar with epoxy resin hybrid composites. Composites Part B: Engineering, 152, 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.07.015
  24. Kumar, A., & Kumar, D. (2022). Vacuum assisted resin transfer moulding process review and variability analysis using Taguchi optimization technique. Materials Today: Proceedings, 50(Part 5), 1472–1479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.055
  25. Windey, R., AhmadvashAghbash, S., Soete, J., Swolfs, Y., & Wevers, M. (2023). Ultrasonication optimisation and microstructural characterisation for 3D nanoparticle dispersion in thermoplastic and thermosetting polymers. Composites Part B: Engineering, 264, 110920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110920
  26. Seid, A. M., & Adimass, S. A. (2024). Review on the impact behavior of natural fiber epoxy-based composites. Heliyon, 10(20), e39116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39116
  27. Pingulkar, H., Mache, A., Munde, Y., & Siva, I. (2021). A comprehensive review on drop weight impact characteristics of bast natural fiber reinforced polymer composites. Materials Today: Proceedings, 44(Part 5), 3872–3880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.925
  28. Quaresimin, M., Ricotta, M., Martello, L., & Mian, S. (2013). Energy absorption in composite laminates under impact loading. Composites Part B: Engineering, 44(1), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.06.020
  29. Wang, K., Xu, C., Gao, B., Song, L., & Meng, S. (2024). Analysis of the fracture behavior and mechanism of PIP-C/SiC composites at high temperatures. Composite Structures, 348, 118491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118491
  30. Yang, H., Yang, L., Yang, Z., Shan, Y., Gu, H., Ma, J., Zeng, X., Tian, T., Ma, S., & Wu, Z. (2023). Ultrasonic detection methods for mechanical characterization and damage diagnosis of advanced composite materials: A review. Composite Structures, 324, 117554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117554
  31. Rostamiyan, Y., Fereidoon, A., Mashhadzadeh, A. H., Rezaei Ashtiyani, M., & Salmankhani, A. (2015). Using response surface methodology for modeling and optimizing tensile and impact strength properties of fiber orientated quaternary hybrid nanocomposite. Composites Part B: Engineering, 69, 304–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.09.031
  32. Adamu, M., Rahman, M. R., & Hamdan, S. (2019). Formulation optimization and characterization of bamboo/polyvinyl alcohol/clay nanocomposite by response surface methodology. Composites Part B: Engineering, 176, 107297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107297
  33. Sharma, H., Kumar, A., Rana, S., Sahoo, N. G., Jamil, M., Kumar, R., Sharma, S., Li, C., Eldin, S. M., & Abbas, M. (2023). Critical review on advancements on the fiber-reinforced composites: Role of fiber/matrix modification on the performance of the fibrous composites. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 26, 2975–3002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.08.036
  34. Vachon, P.-L., Brailovski, V., & Terriault, P. (2013). Impact-induced damage and damage propagation under flexural load in TiNi and Kevlar-stitched carbon/epoxy laminates. Composite Structures, 100, 424–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.01.011
  35. Zare, Y., & Rhee, K. Y. (2017). Development of a model for tensile strength of polymer nanocomposites assuming filler aggregation and interphase regions. Composites Part B: Engineering, 114, 364–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.01.055
  36. Caminero, M. A., García-Moreno, I., Rodríguez, G. P., & Chacón, J. M. (2019). Internal damage evaluation of composite structures using phased array ultrasonic technique: Impact damage assessment in CFRP and 3D printed reinforced composites. Composites Part B: Engineering, 165, 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.091
  37. Zhang, G., Liu, Y., Lv, Z., Wang, J., Zhang, W., & Wu, Y. (2021). Research on impact resistance of ceramic matrix composites. Composite Structures, 268, 113977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113977
  38. Li, Y., Wang, N., & Zhou, M. (2021). High speed crack propagation characteristics of functionally graded brittle materials under ultra-high loading rate. Thin-Walled Structures, 161, 107397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2020.107397
  39. Goud, B. N., Sura, S., Aravind, P., Lal, B. J., Sanskruti, K., & Pavan, C. (2022). An experimental study on mechanical properties of Kevlar composite for aircraft structural applications. Materials Today: Proceedings, 64(Part 1), 909–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.06.053
  40. Akindoyo, J. O., Beg, M. D. H., Ghazali, S., Heim, H. P., Feldmann, M., & Mariatti, M. (2019). Oxidative induction and performance of oil palm fiber reinforced polypropylene composites – Effects of coupling agent and UV stabilizer. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 125, 105577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105577
  41. Hartwig, G., Hübner, R., Knaak, S., & Pannkoke, C. (1998). Fatigue behaviour of composites. Cryogenics, 38(1), 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-2275(97)00113-6
  42. Ghazanfari, H., Blais, C., Gariépy, M., Savoie, S., Schulz, R., & Alamdari, H. (2020). Improving wear resistance of metal matrix composites using reinforcing particles in two length-scales: Fe₃Al/TiC composites. Surface and Coatings Technology, 386, 125502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.125502
  43. Liu, P., Xu, L., Li, J., Peng, J., & Jiao, Z. (2024). Advanced science and technology of polymer matrix nanomaterials. Materials, 17(2), 461. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17020461
  44. Lin, L.-Y., Lee, J.-H., Hong, C.-E., Yoo, G.-H., & Advani, S. G. (2006). Preparation and characterization of layered silicate/glass fiber/epoxy hybrid nanocomposites via vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM). Composites Science and Technology, 66(13), 2116–2125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.12.025
  45. Mansor, M. R., Fadzullah, S. H. S. M., & Nurfaizey, A. H. (2021). Life cycle assessment (LCA) analysis of composite products in automotive applications. In Biocomposite and synthetic composites for automotive applications (pp. 147–172). Woodhead Publishing Series in Composites Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820559-4.00005-5
  46. Guo, K., Ren, Y., Han, G., Xie, T., & Jiang, H. (2025). Hygrothermal aging and durability prediction of 3D-printed hybrid fiber composites with continuous carbon/Kevlar-fiber and short carbon-fiber. Engineering Failure Analysis, 167(Part A), 108958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108958
  47. Zhu, X., Chen, W., Liu, L., Xu, K., Luo, G., & Zhao, Z. (2023). Experimental investigation on high-velocity impact damage and compression after impact behavior of 2D and 3D textile composites. Composite Structures, 303, 116256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116256
  48. Sarfraz, M. S., Hong, H., & Kim, S. S. (2021). Recent developments in the manufacturing technologies of composite components and their cost-effectiveness in the automotive industry: A review study. Composite Structures, 266, 113864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113864
  49. Campos, A. A. de, Henriques, E., & Magee, C. L. (2022). Technological improvement rates and recent innovation trajectories in automated advanced composites manufacturing technologies: A patent-based analysis. Composites Part B: Engineering, 238, 109888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109888

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.